A freelance camera op is hurt on a branded shoot — and the production gets named in the suit.
WC in the vendor's own name keeps it a workers'-comp claim, not a lawsuit against the production.
Media Liability, E&O, GL, and WC, issued in the vendor's name and sized to each project — for the roles that genuinely run 1099: editors, VFX, composers, photographers, drone ops, designers. An on-set injury becomes their claim, not a suit against the production.
On-set crew and performers under production control are usually W-2. The independent layer — post, branded, and creative vendors — is where per-project coverage in the contractor's name fits.
WC in the vendor's own name keeps it a workers'-comp claim, not a lawsuit against the production.
Per-project coverage closes the WC gap — no payroll markup on a one-week cut.
Media Liability sized to the project covers copyright, clearance, and publicity-rights risk.
Per-project E&O, GL, and WC issue in the vendor's name, agency as additional insured — before the first deliverable, not after.
A pre-insured bench of editors, VFX, and photographers compounds project after project.
What lives between the SOW and delivery — E&O, Media Liability, GL, and WC sized to a project, not a calendar year.
When you issue the SOW, your project system calls our Assignments API — vendor, deliverable-keyed job, start date, jurisdiction. It returns a per-project rate and binds in the vendor's name when they opt in. No payroll cycle, no markup.
Production accountants see the full math, separated by coverage line and scaled to the engagement. No monthly retainer, no payroll markup, no end-of-year retroactive premium.
E&O, Media Liability, GL, and WC issue in the vendor's name, with the production company or agency added as additional insured. So an on-set injury becomes the vendor's claim on their own policy — not a suit against the production. ACORD-compliant, per-project.
Months after delivery, an audit no longer means reconstructing vendor COIs from email threads. The packet pulls itself together — vendor, project, jurisdiction, all green.
They did it literally the night before the shoot and it just went right through, and I downloaded the cert and I have it saved and they have their copy... it really seemed to be like a two-minute thing, and they had no complaints. They didn't say they were confused or anything like that.
Which roles genuinely qualify as independent, how per-project E&O, Media Liability, and WC work, and where coverage in the contractor's name fits.
Usually the independent post, branded, and creative layer — editors, VFX artists, colorists, composers, photographers, drone operators, and designers who control how and where they deliver. On-set crew and performers working under the production's direction and schedule are typically W-2, often through a payroll company. The line turns on control and how the work is structured, not the title on the call sheet.
Often — and the real exposure is misclassification, not the 1099 label. In ABC-test states like California, New Jersey, and Massachusetts, and under New York's analysis, a contractor can be reclassified as an employee based on the degree of control and how the work is set up. If that happens, or if an uninsured vendor is injured during the work, the production company can end up the de facto employer on the comp claim. WC carried in the vendor's own name keeps an injury with their policy and is one supporting signal that they're genuinely independent — not a substitute for the full classification test, but it closes the gap that would otherwise land on the production.
Coverage binds around the project window and the deliverable. Media Liability is priced per shoot day and covers copyright, clearance, and publicity-rights risk on the footage that ships; E&O and GL follow the engagement. Each policy is issued in the vendor's name, with the agency or production added as additional insured where the contract requires it.
Not when the policy is issued to the vendor as the named insured. 1099Policy issues coverage to the contractor and adds the production or agency as a blanket additional insured — the opposite of an EOR arrangement, where the contractor becomes a W-2 employee. Coverage in their own name supports, rather than undermines, independent-contractor status.
Their policy is designed to respond first — workers' comp covers medical and lost-wage benefits, while the production's separate GL and additional-insured status address secondary liability. The claim stays with the vendor's coverage instead of becoming a suit against the production.
The vendor — always. Their name or business entity is on the COI, the carrier holds the policy in their name, and claims pay out to them. The production company or agency is added as additional insured where required.
Per-project E&O, Media Liability, GL, and WC in the contractor's name — for post, branded, and creative vendors. Sized to the deliverable, issued before kickoff.
